I am interested in how phonology and morphology interact.
Morpho-phonological Polarity
Can a morpheme force a feature to switch values? I don’t think so:
and here, too:
Maximal Words
I proposed that prosodic words can be restricted in size, and those limits can affect morphological words. I talk about this here:
de Lacy, Paul (2004). Maximal Words and the Māori passive. In John McCarthy (ed.) Optimality Theory in phonology: A reader. Blackwell, pp. 495-512.
and the longer 2003 version.
My student Kate Ketner (now Gürtler) wrote her dissertation about maximal words:
Ketner, Katherine (2006). Size restrictions in prosodic morphology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge. ROA 1028.
Morphological Hapology and Circumscription
I have some ideas about why some near-identical morphemes merge (e.g. cat+s(plural)+s(possessive) -> cats’):
And I think that these morphemes can account for ‘circumscriptive’ morphemes, which carve out a morpheme and influence it:
and another paper in 2017, and an earlier paper in 1996.
Concatenation
I also had some ideas about why prefixes are prefixes and suffixes are suffixes: